Comments on: Replacing Rhino with Moq http://fooberry.com/2009/11/10/replacing-rhino-with-moq/ Sweetness Without Context Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:09:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: mark http://fooberry.com/2009/11/10/replacing-rhino-with-moq/comment-page-1/#comment-6878 mark Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:18:25 +0000 http://fooberry.com/2009/11/10/replacing-rhino-with-moq/#comment-6878 @Bill The only thing that is kinda painful so far is not mocking delegates. We are having to do a lot of It.IsAny<Func<MyObject,bool>>() to mock x=>x.value == "foo", and that is no where near safe, but mocking delegates in general is pretty hard. We've been happy with it so far. @Bill The only thing that is kinda painful so far is not mocking delegates. We are having to do a lot of It.IsAny>() to mock x=>x.value == “foo”, and that is no where near safe, but mocking delegates in general is pretty hard.

We’ve been happy with it so far.

]]> By: Bill Sorensen http://fooberry.com/2009/11/10/replacing-rhino-with-moq/comment-page-1/#comment-6877 Bill Sorensen Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:10:51 +0000 http://fooberry.com/2009/11/10/replacing-rhino-with-moq/#comment-6877 I don't think you'll regret it. I find Moq elegant. See this thread on Stack Overflow for more info: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1718463/what-are-the-real-world-pros-and-cons-of-each-of-the-major-mocking-frameworks/1719391 I don’t think you’ll regret it. I find Moq elegant.

See this thread on Stack Overflow for more info:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1718463/what-are-the-real-world-pros-and-cons-of-each-of-the-major-mocking-frameworks/1719391

]]>